📋 Surveillance Framework
Data quality and system completeness metrics - Surveillance Performance and Spatial Intelligence Framework
🔍 Filters
Data Quality Overall
92%
Completeness
88%
Timeliness
85%
Training Coverage
78%
Active Staff
2145
Reporting Sites
147
📊 Charts - Surveillance Performance Metrics
Data Quality by Component
Training Coverage Distribution
🏥 Surveillance System Performance by Component
| Component | Sites | Staff | Data Quality % | Training % | Completeness % | Timeliness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔍 Detection System | 147 | 520 | 92% | 85% | 90% | < 2 hours |
| 👥 Contact Tracing | 120 | 847 | 88% | 78% | 85% | < 4 hours |
| 🧪 Testing & Lab | 45 | 420 | 90% | 92% | 95% | < 48 hours |
| 🏥 Isolation Mgmt | 78 | 358 | 85% | 68% | 80% | < 6 hours |
| OVERALL SYSTEM | 147 | 2145 | 92% | 78% | 88% | < 3.5h avg |
📌 Key Framework Domains (6 Core Intelligence Areas)
1. Detection Delay
Mean: 5.4 days | Target: <3 days
2. Contact Tracing
Coverage: 72.5% | Target: >80%
3. Case Ascertainment
Sensitivity: 85% | Target: >90%
4. Lab Confirmation
TAT: 2.3 days | Target: <2 days
5. Isolation Delay
Mean: 3.8 days | Target: <3 days
6. Spatial Intelligence
14/18 districts | Risk gaps: 4